Post by account_disabled on Feb 27, 2024 4:50:51 GMT -5
I don't know about you, but I can't wait to delight in the talent of Emma Stone and Ryan Gosling at the premiere of La La Land: A Love Story. Yes, I declare myself a hopeless romantic and a lover of emotional stories; so since I saw the trailer I knew I couldn't resist. After all, I can't think of a better duo, any other era, or a more captivating sound than jazz. It is said that this film could put Stone back in the Oscar race, and although so far these comments are little more than speculation, the truth is that her success as an actress has placed her on the cover of Rolling Stone magazine for next January 2017. This after having given an interview to Jonás Weiner . It should be noted that this is the first time in more than a year that a woman appears on the cover of this publication alone, since the previous one in March 2016 was Hillary Clinton and she was accompanied by Bernie Sanders. During the interview that began at the actress's favorite sushi place in Los Angeles, she recounts a series of experiences about how and why she got into acting, what path she had to travel to become a Hollywood star and what challenges she has faced. had to face within the industry. There have been times in the past, shooting a film, where I have been told that I hindered the process when I gave an opinion or an idea. This is not an interview about sexism in the film industry or feminism. In reality, as the interviewer presents it, it seems like a relaxed, fun chat with a professional who knows little about arrogance. It is perhaps the result of having been a girl who relied on theater and comedy for therapy more than for ambition, although in doing so she found an extraordinary talent and a passion that gives life to a lot of characters, in the middle of a sea of obstacles.
There have been times when I have New Zealand WhatsApp Number improvised, they have laughed at my jokes and given them to my partner, a man What is found in this text is an intelligent woman who has experienced sexism firsthand, who has overcome many challenges and who is concerned about her environment. Regarding Donald Trump's recent victory in the presidential election, Stone comments that it is still difficult to process. «It's scary not knowing, but I can't stop thinking about the people vulnerable to being ignored or left out. More marginalized than they have already been for hundreds of years; and how the planet will die without our help », she laments. I think something is not right then All in all, I still think there's something not right. On the cover of Rolling Stone, Emma appears dressed in a nude nightgown that, although it looks spectacular on her, does not fully support the message she leaves within the pages. I know you will say: – Stop! How can you imply that she is less of a feminist just because she wears a nightgown? –. I don't, and to avoid confusion I will make some ideas clear. No, the fact that Emma Stone is beautiful does not make her less intelligent, - and by saying that she is beautiful, I do not intend to treat her as an object or dismiss her talent. No, taking photos in a nightgown, a set of lingerie, or even naked, does not make a woman more or less feminist than the rest. No, no woman should be judged by the way she chooses to show herself. However, this may not have been the best opportunity for that specific photograph. The reason? She denounced sexism in the industry and at the same time has contributed to perpetuating one of the most tangible sexist practices at Rolling Stone.
To show it, you should take a look at a comparison published by Society Pages in 2011 . It analyzed the covers of the magazine between 1967 and 2011 to determine whether men and women were equally sexualized when appearing in this space. A total of eleven different variables were considered to measure different aspects of sexualization and the results, unfortunately, were not a surprise. Once the images from 43 years of covers were scored, they were classified into three categorie and hyper-sexualized. Between 83% and 89% of the images of men were located in the first group and only 2% of them became hyper-sexualized. In contrast, 83% of women were sexualized or hyper-sexualized by the 2000s. This means that while the most common images of men were similar to this: Most of the female images in the magazine are close to this: Is Emma's cover far from this reality? I told them that I didn't think something was going to work and they told me: 'Say it, say it, if it doesn't work, we'll cut it.' And then they didn't cut it, and it really didn't look good. We will try (or perhaps better avoid) thinking that this was one of the occasions that the actress herself refers to during the interview and we will stick with the experience she shares from when she worked with the Mexican Alejandro González Iñárritu. As she tells it, she was in the middle of a difficult scene, about to give up, so she went to her dressing room to take out her frustration and she came back determined to stop trying to please the director. That's when he said: «Beautiful — there it is! (Beautiful, there it is). Come on! Really, after reading the interview, the only thing the experience left me with was a paradigm shift on the cover of Rolling Stone. Something closer to the phrase with which one of the trailers for his most recent film opens. Not that anyone has undone that paradigm before.
There have been times when I have New Zealand WhatsApp Number improvised, they have laughed at my jokes and given them to my partner, a man What is found in this text is an intelligent woman who has experienced sexism firsthand, who has overcome many challenges and who is concerned about her environment. Regarding Donald Trump's recent victory in the presidential election, Stone comments that it is still difficult to process. «It's scary not knowing, but I can't stop thinking about the people vulnerable to being ignored or left out. More marginalized than they have already been for hundreds of years; and how the planet will die without our help », she laments. I think something is not right then All in all, I still think there's something not right. On the cover of Rolling Stone, Emma appears dressed in a nude nightgown that, although it looks spectacular on her, does not fully support the message she leaves within the pages. I know you will say: – Stop! How can you imply that she is less of a feminist just because she wears a nightgown? –. I don't, and to avoid confusion I will make some ideas clear. No, the fact that Emma Stone is beautiful does not make her less intelligent, - and by saying that she is beautiful, I do not intend to treat her as an object or dismiss her talent. No, taking photos in a nightgown, a set of lingerie, or even naked, does not make a woman more or less feminist than the rest. No, no woman should be judged by the way she chooses to show herself. However, this may not have been the best opportunity for that specific photograph. The reason? She denounced sexism in the industry and at the same time has contributed to perpetuating one of the most tangible sexist practices at Rolling Stone.
To show it, you should take a look at a comparison published by Society Pages in 2011 . It analyzed the covers of the magazine between 1967 and 2011 to determine whether men and women were equally sexualized when appearing in this space. A total of eleven different variables were considered to measure different aspects of sexualization and the results, unfortunately, were not a surprise. Once the images from 43 years of covers were scored, they were classified into three categorie and hyper-sexualized. Between 83% and 89% of the images of men were located in the first group and only 2% of them became hyper-sexualized. In contrast, 83% of women were sexualized or hyper-sexualized by the 2000s. This means that while the most common images of men were similar to this: Most of the female images in the magazine are close to this: Is Emma's cover far from this reality? I told them that I didn't think something was going to work and they told me: 'Say it, say it, if it doesn't work, we'll cut it.' And then they didn't cut it, and it really didn't look good. We will try (or perhaps better avoid) thinking that this was one of the occasions that the actress herself refers to during the interview and we will stick with the experience she shares from when she worked with the Mexican Alejandro González Iñárritu. As she tells it, she was in the middle of a difficult scene, about to give up, so she went to her dressing room to take out her frustration and she came back determined to stop trying to please the director. That's when he said: «Beautiful — there it is! (Beautiful, there it is). Come on! Really, after reading the interview, the only thing the experience left me with was a paradigm shift on the cover of Rolling Stone. Something closer to the phrase with which one of the trailers for his most recent film opens. Not that anyone has undone that paradigm before.